Legislators in California have proposed a bill that would let striking workers to receive unemployment compensation. Assemblymember Ash Kalra and Senator Anthony Portantino introduced Senate Bill 799.
Extending Unemployment Benefits to Striking Workers Sparks Debat
Workers on strike would be able to get benefits under the proposed legislation. two weeks after they first went on strike. The state’s unemployment insurance fund would be responsible for funding the benefits.
Labour unions claim that the law will support workers who are on strike, hence they are in favour of it. to maintain their standard of living while they strive for improved pay and working conditions. Businesses and some Republicans are among those who oppose the legislation. Make the case that it would promote strikes and make it harder for businesses to run.
The Assembly Labour and Employment Committee is presently debating the bill. It’s uncertain whether the legislation will approve the bill this session.
Pros and Cons of Proposed California Legislation
Some of the justifications for and against the measure are listed below:
Defending the legislation:
- Workers on strike are already having financial difficulties. Additionally, receiving unemployment benefits would help them get by.
- Benefits for unemployment would offer striking workers more negotiating strength. They wouldn’t need to be concerned about losing their money.
- Unemployment compensation would contribute to the peaceful and orderly conduct of strikes.
Arguments opposed to the proposal:
- The bill would promote strikes, which would cause business disruptions and economic hardship.
- The state’s unemployment insurance fund would incur costs as a result of the bill.
- The proposed legislation would not be just to non-striking employees. Considering that they wouldn’t be qualified for unemployment benefits.
The bill is a difficult problem with no simple solutions. The California legislature will determine whether to pass the bill or not.
