Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Nation

64-Year-Old Fumio Kishida Takes Office As The 100th Prime Minister Of Japan

Japan’s new Prime Minister, Fumio Kishida, took office on Monday and will be charged with leading the world’s third-largest economy out of the grip of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a CNN news report.

Following a parliamentary vote, Fumio Kishida, 64, who was elected head of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) last week, was officially recognized as the country’s 100th prime minister — his elevation all but a foregone conclusion given the LDP’s dominance in the lower house. Following the election, Kishida named his new Cabinet, which includes former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s followers. Thirteen of the 20 members have never served in the Cabinet before, three are women, and the average age is 61.

Kishida, a moderate liberal who is seen as a stabilizing authority, inherits a Japan that is surged by rising COVID-19 infections, a stagnant economy, a rapidly aging population, and political unrest with China. From 2012 until 2017, Kishida served as Japan’s foreign minister under Abe, the country’s longest-serving prime leader. He takes over from outgoing Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga, who declared earlier this month that he would not run for re-election as head of his party after a tumultuous term highlighted by a drop in public support as he tried to suppress the coronavirus.

Fumio Kishida Received Applause As He Got Elected As Japan’s New Prime Minister (Photo: Getty Images)

Read Also: Major COVID-19 Program Aids In America Comes To End: Will There Be A Fourth Stimulus Payment?

Fumio Kishida Was Not A Popular Choice

According to analysts, Kishida is considered  a consensus builder and a stable option by the establishment. However, the political veteran was not a popular pick; he received little public support and failed to shed his reputation as a dreary bureaucrat. The upcoming general election will be his first significant test, as he will be the face of a party that has been chastised for its handling of the pandemic under Suga.

Fumio Kishida Planned Undertakings For His Administration

Kishida stated in his first address as prime minister on Monday that implementing effective COVID-19 countermeasures, including vaccinations, intensified testing, and providing support to the country’s health systems, will be his top priority.

Japan has vaccinated 60% of its people against COVID-19, and the country’s state of emergency was lifted last week due to a decrease in infections. Japan has reduced entry restrictions for some foreigners, and social and business constraints are progressively decreasing. However, there are chances that the virus will resurface over the winter months.

Kishida, as planned, set October 31 as the date for the next general election. On the concluding day of an extraordinary Diet session on October 14, he would dissolve the House of Representatives, paving the scene for election campaigning to begin on October 19.

Related Article: Putin, Other World Leaders And Billionaires Stowed Insane Amounts Of Cash In Secret Bank Accounts, Leaked Documents Reveal

Nation

Preserving Western Interests: Preventing a Chain Reaction in Eastern Europe

Ukraine, Russia, Western Aid, NATO, Geopolitical Consequences

As Western leaders grapple with the consequences of a potential Russian victory in Ukraine, the risks of abandoning this embattled nation become increasingly evident. The failure to deliver promised aid, both from the U.S. ($60 billion) and the European Union (50 billion euros), is pushing Ukraine to the brink. Let’s delve into the hypothetical scenario of the West reneging on its commitments and the domino effect it might trigger.

Preserving Western Interests: Preventing a Chain Reaction in Eastern Europe

Preserving Western Interests: Preventing a Chain Reaction in Eastern Europe

Cascading Consequences of Aid Failure

The absence of the pledged financial support leaves Ukraine militarily vulnerable. Without adequate weapons and munitions, the Ukrainian military could eventually capitulate to Russia. The specter of Russia’s actions in occupied territories raises concerns of mass atrocities, with reports of “executions, castrations, rapes, torture, and abductions of children” already documented in Ukraine.

The Specter of Russian Occupation

Russian forces, often composed of ex-convicts and untrained soldiers, might inflict a brutal “victor’s justice” upon Ukraine, occupying its entire territory. While total annexation is not guaranteed, installing a puppet regime aligns with Putin’s strategic goals of achieving a “demilitarized,” “denazified,” and “neutral” Ukraine. Such a scenario could set the stage for Putin’s expansionist ambitions beyond Ukraine’s borders.

Poland: Next in Line?

Putin’s eyes might then turn to NATO countries, starting with Poland. The strategic targeting of Poland, a NATO and EU member with a pro-Western government, makes it a prime candidate for Russian aggression. Proxy armies, troops without insignia, or soldiers masquerading as Ukrainians could initiate a potential invasion, preserving deniability for Putin.

Article 5 and NATO’s Dilemma

While an invasion of a NATO member triggers Article 5 of the NATO Charter, the collective defense clause, doubts are cast on whether NATO would act decisively. Some commentators already question the sacrosanct nature of Article 5, hinting at a potential betrayal. The historical context of Poland being left unsupported in critical moments adds complexity to NATO’s potential response.

Averting Catastrophe: Delivering Promised Aid

The West stands at a critical juncture where abandoning Ukraine could set off a chain reaction with dire consequences. Recognizing the potential fallout, the U.S. and the EU must fulfill their aid pledges to Ukraine promptly. Failure to do so not only risks the sovereignty of Ukraine but also puts Eastern Europe on the precipice of geopolitical upheaval.

Conclusion: A Wake-Up Call for the West

The hypothetical scenario outlined here is not far-fetched, and its avoidance hinges on the fulfillment of Western promises to Ukraine. A commitment to supporting nations facing aggression is not just a matter of geopolitical strategy but a moral imperative. As Ukraine grapples with the looming threat, the West’s response will determine the course of events in a region where the specter of history looms large.